© 2022 KPCW

KPCW
Spencer F. Eccles Broadcast Center
PO Box 1372 | 460 Swede Alley
Park City | UT | 84060
Office: (435) 649-9004 | Studio: (435) 655-8255

Music & Artist Inquiries: music@kpcw.org
News Tips & Press Releases: news@kpcw.org
Volunteer Opportunities
General Inquiries: info@kpcw.org
Listen Like a Local Park City & Heber City Summit & Wasatch counties, Utah
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
Available On Air Stations
Park City

Legal challenge to Park City annexation thrown out; case may head to appellate court

Quinn's Junction annexation
Park City Municipal
/
Park City hopes to annex 1,200 acres of land to the east of the city (in blue).

A Third District Court judge ruled in favor of Park City and Summit County on Wednesday as the city moves forward in its effort to annex 1,200 acres of land east of Park City.

Utah Third District Court Judge Richard Mrazik came to a decision Wednesday after just over an hour of arguments by Summit County, Park City, and an LLC called Hideout Community Advancement & Development, or HCAD.

After oral arguments, Judge Mrazik took 10 minutes in his chambers before delivering his ruling.

“The court further determines that plaintiff HCAD does not have standing … to file a protest to Park City’s annexation petition," he said. "Accordingly, the Summit County Boundary Commission’s February 2022 decision is affirmed. All claims and plaintiff’s complaint petition for review are dismissed with prejudice. On these bases, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied, defendant Summit County Boundary Commission’s motion for summary judgment is granted.” 

Dismissing a claim with prejudice means the plaintiff cannot file the claim again.

Park City began the process of annexing 1,200 acres of land east of the city last October, and cited the early 2000s Flagstaff development agreement as its justification. But the annexation was challenged in court by HCAD, which owns land adjoining the parcels the city wants to annex, in March. According to property and court records, HCAD is associated with Larry H. Miller Real Estate and Nate Brockbank.

Brockbank is a developer with close ties to the town of Hideout’s ongoing efforts to annex into the Richardson Flat area itself.

Stewart Hiatt represented HCAD at the hearing and requested a stay of the court’s decision.

“We may be without recourse," said Hiatt. "Then again, I have to confer with my client, in light of the court’s ruling, as to whether it wants to appeal, but I need to make that motion in order to present the issue to you.” 

Mrazik said Hiatt’s request for a stay was made in good faith, but he was not ready to make that decision on Wednesday. That decision could be made sometime next week.

A stay, if granted, could delay a public hearing and vote on the annexation by the Park City Council scheduled for June 16. HCAD can also appeal Mrazik’s decision.

The Park City Planning Commission voted unanimously on May 25 to recommend the annexation to the city council.

Commission chair John Phillips said at that time that the city has done its due diligence and is ready to move forward with the annexation.

“I think it’s all consistent and it follows, basically, what was intended years ago," Phillips said. "I’m happy with where we’re at on this. I think it’s ready for some action, move it up to city council.”

HCAD has 28 days to file an appeal of Mrazik’s ruling.